





















Review Summary
The UniDyn brings a familiar yet refined design to its lineup. It features a lightweight titanium body that doubles as the chamber, a simplified condenser, and the new “BallR” cap with heat-storing stainless steel balls. While the updated “BallR” cap does enhance heat retention and vapor extraction, and the overall performance is arguably the best DynaVap has offered, it still comes with the quirks typical of manual heating. The experience can be inconsistent, with a learning curve around heat control, and the lack of precise digital adjustment makes it less beginner-friendly compared to popular battery-powered alternatives like the Venty or Solo 3.
- • #1 on Best Battery-free Vaporizer
Pricing Info ⓘ
Comparison
![]() DynaVap UniDyn
|
![]() Dynavap M7
|
![]() Tinymight 2
|
![]() Arizer Solo 3 (V2)
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Score (1-5) |
4.3 Current Review |
4.4 |
4.6 |
4.9 |
Brand | DynaVap | Dynavap | Tinymight | Arizer |
Retail Price |
$129.00 |
$100.00 |
$349.00 |
$344.00 |
Release Date | March 2025 | March 2024 | March 2024 | April 2025 |
Compatible With | Dry Herb | Dry Herb | Dry Herb | Dry Herb, Aromatherapy |
Heating Method | Manual | Manual | Convection | 80% Convection / 20% Conduction |
Vaping Style | On-Demand | Session + On-demand | Session + On-demand | |
Body Material | Titanium | Stainless steel | Wood | Aluminum |
Mouthpiece Material | Titanium | Stainless steel | Glass | Glass |
Heat Up Time | 10 Seconds | 10 Seconds | 2-5 Seconds | 15 Seconds |
Precise Temp Control | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
Temperature Range | N/A | One Level | 248-464°F | 122-428°F |
Oven Capacity | 0.15 | 0.15gr | 0.5 | |
Oven Material | Titanium | Stainless Steel | Ceramic/Stainless | Glass |
Glass Compatible | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Battery Type | Battery-free | Replaceable | Internal | |
Battery Capacity | 2800mAh | |||
Sessions Per Charge | N/A | N/A | 6-9 | 9-12 |
Charge Time | N/A | 1-2 Hours | 3-4 Hours | |
Charger Type | N/A | USB-C | USB-C | |
Passthrough Charging | ✓ | |||
Display Type | LED | Multicolor | ||
Smartphone App | ✗ | ✗ | ||
Firmware Updates | ✗ | |||
Adjustable Airflow | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | |
Warranty | 30 Days | 90 Days | 10 Years | 2 Years |
Background
DynaVap just released the UniDyn– their flagship device for 2025, and in this review I’ll go over the design, features, what’s fresh, what’s familiar, and how DynaVap is trying to hijack the term “ball vape” and attach it to their brand. I’ve got some praise to share, but I won’t shy away from the gimmicks and flaws either. So this will be an interesting one.

The UniDyn is available from vgear.com and coupon code VG10 will save you 10% on the $130 retail price. They also sell the BallR cap separately, which is compatible with any existing DynaVap.
Design
So as far as the design, it’s pretty familiar stuff if you’re ever used a DynaVap, from any generation really. There is the cap, the vapor path (aka condenser), and the body- which is now the same piece as the chamber. Hence, “Uni.”

Body + Chamber
The body is made from Tintaum and is really light weight. It weighs just a tad under 5gr.
DynaVap advertises a 0.1gr chamber, but in my testing I wasn’t able to fit as much. If I really packed it tight, like tighter than it should be, I was able to fit half of that- maybe a little bit more. This is a convection vaporizer, so a loose pack works best. To fit 0.1gr in there I’d have to pack it super tight, which is not recommended in convection vapes.

The screen in there is made from stainless steel and there is a half bowl setting I believe, but I never used it. I’m not sure how I am supposed to push it out from the other side- the condenser is not long enough. Also there were no instructions and scanning the QR code on the box leads to a generic page with zero “specific” info about the UniDyn. So yea I leave it on the default bowl size. It’s small enough as it is imo.

Condenser
Next up is the condenser, also made from titanium. Unlike earlier models with multiple pairs of o-rings, the UniDyn has just two, located here. DynaVap claims that sliding the stem up and down adjusts the airflow, but in my testing, I couldn’t detect any real difference—the airflow felt consistent across all settings. To me, this seems more like a gimmick than a meaningful feature.

BallR Cap
DynaVap calls this the “BallR” cap, and it is compatible with all previous versions of the DynaVap (that use the 0.1 bowl).

It has a bunch of tiny stainless steel balls right here inside the tip of the cap. You can hear them rattle inside. While heating up the tip with a torch or an induction heater, these balls store heat which is pulled into the chamber with each inhale, extracting the compounds from the herb.
A word about “Ball vapes”
Ball vapes have been a “thing” for years, and usually when users refer to a “ball vape” they are talking about vapes like the Ruby Twist or the MiniNail. These are larger heat extraction devices that are usually used with a desktop setup. Ball Vapes are a niche of dry herb vaporizers, one that has exploded in popularity in the last couple of years.

“Real” Ball vapes have been praised for their amazing extraction and pure convection flavor. They are super powerful and many users consider them as being the best “extraction devices” (aka vaporizers) available for dry herb. Their cons are that they are big, require a desktop setup with glass and water filtration, and they have a bunch of “exposed” extremely hot parts that you probably don’t want around you unless you know what you’re doing.

The UniDyn does have balls—but it’s not a “ball vape”, at least not as originally defined. DynaVap’s decision to market it as a “ball vape” is misleading in my opinion. They’ve also overhauled their entire website to focus on ball vapes. Now, a Google search for “ball vape” pulls up DynaVap’s new so-called “ball vape” at the top, shoving aside companies that have been making true ball vapes for years, cutting into their visibility.
As a heavyweight in the industry, DynaVap’s essentially hijacked the term and branded it as their own. I’m still wrestling with how I feel about that.
Performance
As far as performance, yes, this is the best DynaVap ever made. The Uni body, the cap, the heat transfer, are all great. With that said, there is some level of variability that is associated with “battery free” vapes. Since there is no digital control and the heating is done manually, there is a lot of space for something to go wrong. I’ve had many accidents- from the temperature at the “click” being too low and producing zero vapor, to trying to fix that and ending up with a temp too high and accidental combustion.

There is some guess work involved, and the experience is not as consistent as battery operated portables like the Venty, the Solo 3, or the TM2.
I’ve only used mine with an induction heater, the Wand, as “open flames” just aren’t my thing, and in fact I don’t own even one torch. And while the vaporizer itself is tiny, so it’s easy to think you just “don’t feel it” in your pocket, in reality you have to use a torch or an induction heater, so the portability is substantially reduced.
The sessions where everything works right and things are perfect, yea it works very well. But not all sessions “click” and sometimes the experience is less pleasant.
Bottom line
And therefore, I suggest that new users stay away from the UniDyn, or any other “battery free” vaporizer and go for something with a more controlled heating system. Read my reviews for the Venty or the Solo 3 for example, these are two leading options.

But if you already own a battery free vaporizer and are comfortable with the usage process, this may be a good time to upgrade. The new cap (which is available separately) will produce better results than the older “conduction dominant” caps.
The new UniDyn is one of the best “battery free” vaporizers of this year. While I wouldn’t recommend it for first timers, if you know what to expect, the UniDyn is worth the upgrade.
I don’t think DynaVap needed to use any marketing gimmicks. The oven size is not accurate, the “airflow control” has zero function, it lacks clear instructions, and calling this a “ball vape” to capitalize on the term is misleading at best in my opinion. Too bad, the vape is still a good vape even without all this fluff.